Help
Sign In
american people
March 2009 
The United States of America
inlink
I'm not clear on who or what the United States of America is. The best I can make of it, the United States is the government, America is the people.
Let us take for example a Federal Reserve Note, "legal" tender for all debts public and private, and equate "In God We Trust" printed on said note. How do we do that? "Legal" is merely the form of law. Hitler was legal. I trust that there is a Creator. I do not trust America's legal institution nor do I trust the United States. Involving the United States with God is, in my view, a lie. The United States is merely a "legal" entity, and no different than a Nazi government in principle.
The American people's Constitution starts with "We, the People, of the United States. . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." So, which is it, the American people's Constitution or the U.S. legal establishment's Constitution, with "legal" tender in mind. By stating "In God We Trust," Federal Reserve Notes imply the American people and the United States are one. It's a lie. The United States is a fraud. It does not represent the American people. It doesn't even represent a fourth of the people.
Federal Reserve Notes are printed by a private for profit corporation, The Federal Reserve Bank, which charges interest on the money it loans; that is, the bank notes that state "legal" tender for all debts public and private-pieces of paper with nothing of tangible value to back them. We, the people, owe a private bank with which the United States struck a bad faith deal during the Christmas holidays, when most of the representatives of the people were home for the holidays.
Credit, if properly managed, is a good thing. It allows for an expanding economy. But the same as you and I, if a nation over-borrows there comes a day of reckoning. In bad faith, the United States has incurred an accrued liability of 7 trillion dollars, several times as much as the rate of the expanding economy should allow, and to the great profit of a privately owned bank, with interest charged against the American taxpayer. By expanding the money supply with printing press money at minimal cost to the Federal Reserve Bank there will come a day when the interest charged by the Fed alone will take all the taxes the American people pay. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Nobody seems to catch on to what the United States is doing to our freedoms. The chief accountant for the United States came to the American people to report that the United States is going bankrupt. Pray tell me what happens when your government goes bankrupt. I've yet to hear a peep from the American people.
Are we U.S. citizens or the American people? The IRS considers us "employees." I questioned the IRS. I was sent a section of the U.S. Code that applied to employees of the United States. There is no law on the books that allows the IRS to collect income tax from the American people. It doesn't matter. The IRS informed me in a letter that it has the "legal" authority to collect up to 100 percent of my income in income tax. It is the same as the "legal" authority to wipe out 6 million Jews like insects. There is no law on the books that allows the Nazi IRS. It is your choice, folks. The law allows the American people to replace the United States. I say the United States is a lawless mafia, the kiss of death to a free people.
Access: Public
Such a scam, isn't it? How power has corrupted them…very sad…
I hope when the sh** hits the fan, that people stand up for themselves. Finally.
In my world, and in a perfect world…the government works for the people. They work for and by US…WE are their bosses, why would we stand for employees who steal from the company? Let's get to firing and rehiring! LOL…
Great post…I enjoy and appreciate your thoughts ;-)
This should be of paramount interest to the American taxpayer. By the way, the word America comes from Amerigo Vespucci, an Italian explorer of the New World. America is not the corrupt United States. The Fifth Amendment (of the so called Bill of Rights) of the American people's Constitution states that every individual is entitled to the right to due process of law; that is, the right to be heard in a meaningful way in a meaningful place.
With respect to the income tax, a group of concerned citizens of the State of New York, decided to be heard on giving federal taxpayer money to church schools. They were heard by the Warren Court (Flast v. Cohen).
The United States contended that taxpayers had no right to be heard on federal income taxes. The case had been heard (in 1946). The U.S. Court of Appeals decided that, although high, taxes were not “take.” That establishes “legal precedence” forever, according to the United States. The Warren Court disagreed with the United States. It gave the taxpayers “legal standing.” However, interesting to me, the Court determined that the individual consequences were too minimal to be considered a violation of rights. In my case, the IRS put me on the street in the name of income tax. The Supreme Court refused to hear me, without comment.
It is of utmost importance that you know this. The group gets the right to be heard in the Supreme Court. If immoral enough, the individual has rights. Strippers have the right to dance in the nude. The Court doesn't believe it has the authority to establish morals. Putting a taxpayer on the street, of course, establishes that it is a moral consideration, like the black slavery issue the Taney Court ruled on. A black slave was the same as a mule or a cow. In the U.S.'s IRS mafia, it is now “eny meany miny moe, catch a taxpayer by his toe. If he hollers make him pay $50 every day.” The makers of the law, the American people's “representatives,” look the other way. It is more blessed to give away the taxpayer's sweat. The Palm Beach Post heard me. The IRS mafia admitted it was “mistaken” about a number of U.S. Code authorities over a period of 11 years. So what else is new? In the mafia, might makes right.
How did it get this way? What happened? When did the people lose their voice???? Was there just a karate chop to the throat, and then the gov. says it's our fault we can't speak?
This whole system is corrupt and poisoned…I can't even start in on it…
We need to just start from scratch…
and be “America in a United State”…and take over from the “United Snakes.”
LOL.
You are thinking Zaadster! We are here to change the world—trickles that make great streams of progress. Look within.
George W. Bush has continued his efforts to destroy the United States Constitution and transform the office of the President into a dictatorship. Today, George W. Bush has issued a new executive order similar to a July 17th, 2007 executive order that allowed the government to potentially seize the property of anybody who they determined without due process was undermining the Iraqi war and reconstruction effort. The language in that executive order was so entirely broad in scope that the executive order even applied to war protesters and political dissidents who might be indirectly undermining the Iraqi war reconstruction effort. This new executive order is similar in nature and uses broad language to allow the government to seize the property of anybody who they believe is attempting to undermine the sovereignty of Lebanon or its democratic processes and institutions. This executive order essentially makes both the Fourth and Fifth Amendments null and void.
Executive Order: Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or Its Democratic Processes and Institutions
The first part of the executive order states that Bush is declaring a national emergency to deal with people who might be undermining Lebanon’s government or democratic institutions. Below is the first part of the executive order.
I GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, determine that the actions of certain persons to undermine Lebanon's legitimate and democratically elected government or democratic institutions, to contribute to the deliberate breakdown in the rule of law in Lebanon, including through politically motivated violence and intimidation, to reassert Syrian control or contribute to Syrian interference in Lebanon, or to infringe upon or undermine Lebanese sovereignty contribute to political and economic instability in that country and the region and constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.
Bush has already issued a directive stating that he will effectively be a dictator in the case of a broadly defined catastrophic emergency, so the language in this executive order stating that he is declaring a national emergency is quite disturbing. It is ridiculous that he would declare a national emergency for a situation pertaining to a country on the other side of the world like Lebanon. How does Lebanon have anything to do with our national security that would justify declaring a national emergency to deal with a potential break down in the rule of law in Lebanon? This is especially true considering the war on terror and the threat of Al-Qaeda is now a proven fraud. These statements in this executive order by Bush are clearly insane.
The executive order continues.
I hereby order:
Section 1. (a) Except to the extent provided in section 203(b)(1), (3), and (4) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1), (3), and (4)), or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order, all property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, including any overseas branch, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:
(i) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State:
(A) to have taken, or to pose a significant risk of taking, actions, including acts of violence, that have the purpose or effect of undermining Lebanon's democratic processes or institutions, contributing to the breakdown of the rule of law in Lebanon, supporting the reassertion of Syrian control or otherwise contributing to Syrian interference in Lebanon, or infringing upon or undermining Lebanese sovereignty;
(B) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services in support of, such actions, including acts of violence, or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order;
(C) to be a spouse or dependent child of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
(D) to be owned or controlled by, or acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.
(b) I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) The prohibitions in paragraph (a) of this section include but are not limited to (i) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order, and (ii) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.
Sec. 2. (a) Any transaction by a United States person or within the United States that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
The text listed above is similar to the language used in the July 17th, 2007 executive order. Much of this new executive order is no different in the fact that due process is not even mentioned which the Fifth Amendment guarantees before an individual’s property is seized. This could include seizing the property of war protesters, political dissidents and anybody else who the government can easily identify as indirectly aiding the undermining of Lebanon’s government and their so called democratic institutions through the far reaching scope of the language.
Below is the full text of the Fifth Amendment which specifically states that a person’s property cannot be taken without due process.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
One of the most disturbing parts of the executive order comes in Section 4 where Bush actually makes a statement regarding people who might have a constitutional presence in the United States. Below is the section.
Sec. 4. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that, because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that, for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1 of this order.
What is so horrible about this part of the executive order is that Bush states that the individual’s Constitutional rights are null and void because he claim’s that the ability to transfer funds or assets instantaneously would make the executive order ineffectual. He states there doesn’t need to be prior notice of a listing or determination made by the government to justify why they took somebody’s property. This effectively gives Bush the ability to take property without providing justification and without a warrant. This is a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment which requires a warrant and probable cause before property is seized.
Below is the full text of the Fourth Amendment.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
This executive order does not reference anything about the government obtaining a warrant or having probable cause. If the government dictates that an individual is undermining the government of Lebanon or its so called democratic institutions than they can confiscate the individual's property.
This new executive order is horrible and gives the executive branch of the government more unconstitutional powers. Bush essentially abolished the Fifth Amendment with the July 17th, 2007 executive order and now he has essentially abolished the Fourth Amendment in this new executive order. George W. Bush is clearly hell bent on destroying the Constitution through unconstitutional executive orders and directives. Bush is trying to legislate through the executive branch to dismantle the Constitution and give the President the authority of a dictator. He needs to be impeached and put on trial for all sorts of criminality. He swore an oath to defend the Constitution yet he has done everything to destroy it.
When you mention George W. Bush, you are speaking of America's intelligentsia.
American history is full of stories of the rambunctious Americans. We were undisciplined, wayward, unruly, incapable of control or guidance, determined to resist authority, willful, obstinate, determined to have our own way, headstrong. “Stonewall Jackson” beat the hell out of scheming, conniving bankers by taking his message to the people.
That American image I mention ended with the loss of admiration all around the world. The American people have succumbed to the George Bush image. We are lackadaisical, lacking in spirit, liveliness, lacking in interest, listless, hothouse grown.
Bush is a jellyfish, guided by a pack self-serving punks!
In our American past, idleness was said to be the devil's workshop. Achievement tests prove it. The American people have been dumbed down. We don't know whether we are afoot or horseback. We're merely going through the motions. With an election coming up, we better change. We either change or we're not long for this world.
Damn right, Inlink!!!
What I want to know, with this new executive order, and the takeover of every right we ever had…
Where is the OUTRAGE? Where is the change-bringing Anger? (not violence)
People have gotten dumber than I thought!!! Too much Paxil, and purple pills, everyones in a stupor!!!