The Atlantean Influence

You want to know why I love being a member of Zaadz? I wrote Zaadster "Free Energy" asking if my Aquarius rising sign could mean I'm a reincarnation of an Atlantean. My answer: "Through the Akashic records whereby all and every lies in record, the resonating frequencies of our conscience harmonize. One by one as humans awaken to our destiny the light of one illumines and enlightens the next." I was referred to two Web pages.

From Heaven's Gate and the Science of Prediction, from David, a psychic, "the only right place to live is way out in the woodsy mountains with a huge survival stash, completely sequestered away from all possible threats of Earth Changes, and where the only "right" person to be with is your elusive "Soul Mate" whom you have known and loved at least since Atlantis."

Karen, my "Soul Mate," and I live "way out in the woodsy mountains" with a freezer full of food. The moment I met Karen I had the feeling that I'd known her from some other time, from some other place.

Getting back to nature has been very big in our life together. Our first date was a hike in the mountains near Portland, Oregon on May 18, 1980. I'll never forget that date. It was the day Mt. St. Helens exploded not 50 miles from our mountain trail. Thankfully, we were southeast of the mountain. The explosion blew out the north side of the mountain. Our days of wine and roses were spent in the mountains every chance we got. We retired in the mountains.

"Free Energy," in a Viktor Schauberger quote: "The Schauberger's' principal preoccupation was the conservation of the forest and wild game, and even in earliest youth my fondest desire was to understand Nature, and thus to come closer to the truth; a truth that I was unable to discover either at school or in church."

"In this quest, I was thus drawn time and time again, up into the forest. I could sit for hours on end and watch the water flowing by without ever becoming tired or bored. At the time I was still unaware that in water the greatest secret lay hidden. Nor did I know that water was the carrier of life or the ur-source of what we call consciousness. Without any preconceptions, I simply let my gaze fall on the water as it flowed past. It was only years later that I came to realize that running water attracts our consciousnesses like a magnet and draws a small part of it along in its wake. It is a force that can act so powerfully, that one temporarily loses consciousness, and involuntarily falls asleep. As time passed, I began to play a game with water's secret powers; I surrendered my so-called free consciousness and allowed the water to take possession of it for a while. Little by little this game became very earnest, because I realized that one could detach one's own consciousness from the body and attach it to that of the water."

"When my own consciousness was eventually returned to me, then the water's deeply concealed psyche often revealed the most extraordinary things to me. As a result of this investigation a researcher was born, who could dispatch his consciousness on a voyage of discovery, as it were. In this way I was able to experience things that had escaped other people's notice, because they were unaware that a human being is able to send forth his free consciousness into those places the eyes cannot see."

"By practicing this blindfolded vision, I eventually developed a bond with mysterious Nature, whose essential being I then slowly learnt to perceive and understand."

In "Free Energy's" second referenced Web site, Theories About Atlantis, Edgar Cayce, Atlantis, "When there is a manifestation of a psychic force, or an occult action, or phenomena, or activity in, upon, of or for, an individual, there is then the rolling back, as it were, or a portion of the physical consciousness - or that mental trained individual consciousness - has been rolled aside, or rolled back, and there is then a visioning - To what? That as from the beginning, a projection OF that form that assumed its position or condition in the Earth as from the beginning, and with those so endowed with that as may be called an insight into psychic sources there may be visioned about a body its astral (if chosen to be termed), rather its thought body, as is projected from same in such a state; especially so when there is the induction, or the inducing of, an unconsciousness of the normal brain, or normal mental body."

"These, then, are entities - sure; whether animal or those endowed with the soul - until they pass through those changes - as there ever has been, see? Also there are those that ever make for those channels in the psychic and occult (we are speaking of, through which man - as it reached that stage, or that position that it became farther and farther from its natural sources, through the same character of channel may it communicate with that from which it is a portion of, or the Creative Forces), and hence the terminology arose as 'Good Spirits' and 'Bad Spirits'; for there are those that partake of the earth, or of the carnal forces, rather than of those forces that are of the spiritual or creative."

"Those that are destruction are of the Earth. Those that are constructive, then, are the good - or the divine and the devilish, bringing for those developments in their various phases. Hence the greater development of that called occult, or psychic forces, during the Atlantean period - and the use of same, and the abuse of same - was during its first thousand years, as we would call light years; not the light of the star, but the sun goes down and the sun goes down - years. That brought about those cycles, or those changes."

"Hence we have that which has been given through many of the sources of information, or the channels for individuals - and in those, these, the entity - as a voice upon waters, or as the wind that moved among the reeds and harkened, or again as when the morning stars sang together and the sons of God beheld the coming of man into his own, through the various realms as were brought by the magnifying of, or the deteriorating of, the use of those forces and powers as manifested themselves in a material area, or those that partook of carnal to the gratification of that that brought about its continual hardening and less ability to harken back through that from which it came, and partaking more and more OF that upon which it became an eater of; or, as is seen even in the material forces in the present: We find those that partake of certain elements, unless these become very well balanced with all sources of what?"

Our universe has grown over the ages to vastness beyond comprehension, to minuteness that is incomprehensible. Physics, the study of mass, energy, motion and force, has finally added consciousness to the mix, this from the study of the microcosmic, which doesn't behave like the world we know. There appears to be communication in the particle world. Put it all together in the terrain of one's consciousness and the truth is stranger than fiction.

The ancient sages of India reasoned, As is the microcosm, so is the macrocosm. I've named the story of my life Highway to the Stars. Both ancients and modern science have found that isolated parts recognize one common wholeness. Thus, from isolated parts to common wholeness, somewhere in-between exists human consciousness.

(While I was composing this blog, an email arrived, as follows, from esaruoho: "Based on your quote on free-energy's sacred geometry one, enjoy.")

My second question yesterday was to another Zaadz friend, Should we be government entitled? Should we be marginalized or capitalized? It seems to me we've got it reversed. By being entitled, we are marginalized, government or otherwise.

My answer: I hate to be the one to admit it, but the industry I currently work in perpetuates entitlement and marginalization - the two sort of go hand in hand; a controlled way of saying "you can't have one without the other".

"It is odd that we 'elect' our government and expect them to create programs that we feel "entitled" to. Special consideration for a wide range of 'differences;' race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, etc, but I feel that the bottom line is something that's been missed; We are all the same, and in a perfect world, equal governance would prevail over the tangled web that is being politically correct. Sadly, it begs the question: Do we own our government, or do they own us?"

"There is a cry for change - more like a faint whisper, but the biggest question is; Do we want to pull the thread and unravel the sweater and if so, how and where do we start?"

I thought no one would ever ask me. My Atlantean archetype says:

Moral philosopher Adam Smith, a key figure in the intellectual movement known as the Scottish Enlightenment authored Wealth of the Nations, an inquiry into the cause of wealth. Published in 1776, the book was the first on modern economics. It came along with the Industrial Revolution. The book dealt with feudalism's legal and military alliance considerations-nobility and the Holy Catholic Church-and the division of labor as it applied to trade and capitalism.

With the arrival of the Industrial Revolution, the pooling of capital and private property rights, wealth was anything but fairly distributed. Carl Heinrich Marx, a German philosopher, was a political and economic revolutionary. In 1848, he wrote the Communist Manifesto, opening with, "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." Marx predicted that organized labor would ultimately defeat capitalism.

Both capitalism and Marxism are connected with power and survival. The problem is inborn. We've yet to evolve into our full human selves. The enlightened view, human intelligence, brings to me my Atlantean archetype answer.

The employer has a social responsibility. The bigger the employer, the more the responsibility. Intelligence says to tax spending, not income, as taxing income empowers government, not the economy from which wealth flows. Moreover, taxing income is empowering the wrong people-politicians and the wealthy. A tax on income encourages the beast in people. We note that the rich get richer and the poor poorer. It is the same as empowering the aristocracy and church in feudalism at the expense of everyone else.

Investment in the economy helps everyone. A robust economy requires large pools of capital. A socialistic system places capital in the hands of politicians, who then take on the role of self-serving capitalists. A tax on spending would say to wealthy capitalists, if you spend your wealth on yourself then you will be taxed accordingly. If you invest your wealth in the economy you will not be taxed at all on that money.

Common sense says you don't tax workers out of existence and redistribute through a government scheme called entitlement. You don't empower government at the expense of the taxpayers. The problem is taxing workers out of their rightful existence. It has only been in recent years that the United States has needlessly done this, in order to entitle them. A tax on spending would exempt items from tax such as food clothing shelter, and other items necessary for a standard American existence, an existence that includes the right to save.

Why the resistence? If you were to write this cure to your representative, I can tell you what you would receive in reply. This was my reply:

"Thank you for contacting me with your support for the Fair Tax Act. As you may know, Senator Chambliss of Georgia introduced S. 25, the Fair Tax Act. This legislation, along with H.R. 25 in the House would repeal the income tax, employment tax and estate and gift tax in favor of a national sales tax" (a tax on spending).

"In January 2005, President Bush appointed a bipartisan panel to study the federal tax code and to propose options to reform the code for purpose of simplification and/or overhaul. The panel considered a number of proposals, including a complete replacement of the federal income tax with a national sales tax. In their final report, the panel rejected the proposal for a national sales tax because it failed to ease the retail sales tax on the lower and middle class."

"Like you, I believe that our current Tax Code is burdensome and confusing. It has proven to be unfair, encourages spending over saving, and is just to complex. However, for the reasons given by the President's own panel, a national sales tax is not a viable option for tax reform."

My letter is signed by Ron Wydon, United States Senator. Among the committees Senator Wydon serves on is the "Special Committee on Aging." Too bad for young taxpayers.

Next to our mountain retreat is a sheep pasture, and nearby a shelter their owner build. The sheep may not know how to build one, but at least they have enough sense to get in out of the rain.

For the past 30 years or more, our answer for unfair tax has been the political answer. Answers must come from individuals who are aware of their inner God-selves. Zaadz is the way to go in discovering who we are and what we are about.