to my friends
I'm a new member, and fired up. I've already been made an ambassador-called upon to spread the word. I come first to you, my friends. Tell me where I'm wrong.
I want to talk about a little known reason for our existence. A clue is in the fact that in my 81 years there have been times when if anything could go wrong it did-Murphy's Law-and other times when no matter what everything went right. It isn't "the luck of the Irish." There has to be a reason for it.
The reason came to me in an unusual way: by an understanding of the microcosmic-where it all begins. But as my friend Alexchua says, "What the bleep do we know?" Well, we can know that reality is not at all what we've been educated to think it is. We can at least open our minds to the possibility that it could be something else. Why should we remain fixed in the established paradigm? The world is rapidly changing. There is a reason for everything, including the cutting edge of science. From the world of the very small, which is nothing like the world we know, science has now found a dimension of infinite possibility, and finally admits that we possess consciousness. And it isn't some electrochemical process in our brains. There is not a particle of evidence. (Pun intended.)
It has now been irrefutably proven by Bell's theorem, using the Pythagorean theorem (by the way, Pythagoras was an astrologer, philosopher, and mystic) that there is such a thing as "superluminance," a non-local state; that is, a state over and beyond the local forces of gravity and electromagnetism, a state wherein there is instantaneous communication. No matter how far two objects move apart, once together, they may not be separated. We're talking about the dimension of infinite possibility, where time and space don't exist, the state before conscious observers observe. Light travels in waves. When observed, it becomes particles. By the way, light waves travel through the vacuum of space, without a medium. At the speed of light, time and space don't exist. That isn't the world we know. The world of particles isn't in the world we know. By observing, we create the world we know.
My question: can it be that the world of subatomic particles has nothing to do with our world? I don't think so. For, if I believed that, then I'd be simply be going through the laws of motion Newton gave us-cyclic-"what comes around goes around." I'm not a trained animal jumping through conventions' hoops, without an independent thought of my own. The latest science gives me the understanding that it all begins from a dimension of infinite possibility. Quantum physics gives us Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Indirectly, we each create our own realities. It is no longer the world of concrete realities. We are living in the past. We've entered the age of innovation.
Back to Murphy's Law, it appears to me that we each arrive with a destiny. When we wander from it, things don't work out the way we planned. When we know we create our reality, we take directions from our conscience. Some of us know from early in our lives what we were called to do, and excel. Unfortunately, I took the path of least resistence. I was natively persuasive. I went into sales work instead of becoming the scientist I was meant to be.
Quantitatively, I did well in sales work. Then came "my calling." It transformed me. The quality of my life improved. I learned that real happiness coincides with love. My greater love of self worked out to be a less self-centered self, a more giving self. It is no coincidence that I found true love. When we give, the return is more valuable than money. The quality of our lives improves.
Happiness is not something that can be legislated. It comes from within. When I was in sales work, I knew that every rejection meant I was closer to a sale. Zaadz is not a legislative body. We lead the world to change by personal influence. Zaadz is a place to make friends, a place to find happiness and to spread it.
When one looks at reality creation from the perspective of a dimension of infinite possibility, it is empowering to know that one can observe and make his or her life better. Life really isn't that complicated. We've been natively equipped to cope. The better one can make his or her life, the better it is for others.
The best to you

Help




I enjoyed the post, but permit me some Socratic quibbling. Surely there’s a difference between destiny and personality. When we deny our personality, we pay through frustration. However, we could still hit by a falling tree, or caught up in a mudslide, hit by someone crossing over the centerline of I5.
Each of us has his or her own destiny, it appears to me, and when we are off of our paths of destiny, well, as Plutarch said, “An idea, having no form by itself, but giving figure and form to shapeless matter, becomes the manifestation, we get hit by a falling tree, or caught up in a mudslide, hit by someone crossing over the centerline of 15. I left my course and ran my boat on the rocks.
My objection is that “destiny” is a path you can’t depart, as in being destined to succeed or fail. This is why I offered the distinction between destiny and personality. Personality both determines who you are now and who you might be. One can resist fulfilling one’s true potential, implied by one’s personality (or soul or whatever you want to call it), but one cannot resist fate (destiny). If we have a destiny, then it must have been our destiny to get hit by a falling tree. Likewise, it could be our destiny never to fulfill our potential.
Hi guys:)!
And What If our destiny is to experience all that we experience… yes, hit by trees & all…
I can't tell you how many trees knocked me over… & yet I see those trees as being embedded in my destiny… refining & defining my personality… guided by the soul…
In spite of this I love trees LOL
PJ
I met a yogi who believed in both destiny AND complete free will. He believed that our destiny would happen no matter what choices we made - train or bus or plane or boat - we could end up at the same destination, but yet we had compete free will. I’m still wrapping my mind around it…
My question: can it be that the world of subatomic particles has nothing to do with our world?
It has everything to do with our world…..everything that is is of everything else that is. We are thought and thought is not just what we see with our eyes. I say it like this. Our real eyes are when we visualize because what we can visualize we can realize.
I think we have to grow in our ability to communicate with that world of subatomic particles.
It's like a new frontier and it is just the most amazing, astonishing, and full of possibilities not even dreamed of by most….kind of world. Think of the word “nothing”. No THING.
And what is No Thing can't be only one thing or many things, but would have to be EVERY THING, only EVERYTHING in a strange kind of energy soup out of which we can make things. Neville Goddard said, “A Master lives a world of his own conscious creation” so maybe it is all about what we allow ourselves to be conscious on. We will be where our focus is.